CVE-2018-5737: BIND 9.12's serve-stale implementation can cause an assertion failure in rbtdb.c or other undesirable behavior, even if serve-stale is not enabled
- Updated on 14 Nov 2018
- 2 minutes to read
Document version: 2.0
Posting date: 18 May 2018
Program impacted: BIND
Versions affected: 9.12.0, 9.12.1
A problem with the implementation of the new serve-stale feature in BIND 9.12 can lead to an assertion failure in rbtdb.c, even when stale-answer-enable is off. Additionally, problematic interaction between the serve-stale feature and NSEC aggressive negative caching can in some cases cause undesirable behavior from named, such as a recursion loop or excessive logging.
Deliberate exploitation of this condition could cause operational problems depending on the particular manifestation -- either degradation or denial of service.
Impact: Servers running a vulnerable version of BIND (9.12.0, 9.12.1) which permit recursion to clients and which have the max-stale-ttl parameter set to a non-zero value are at risk.
CVSS Score: 5.9
CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
For more information on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System and to obtain your specific environmental score please visit: https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.0#CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Workarounds: Setting "max-stale-ttl 0;" in named.conf will prevent exploitation of this vulnerability (but will effectively disable the serve-stale feature.)
Setting "stale-answer enable off;" is not sufficient to prevent exploitation, max-stale-ttl needs to be set to zero.
Active exploits: No known active exploits.
The error which can be exploited in this vulnerability is present in only two public release versions of BIND, 9.12.0 and 9.12.1. If you are running an affected version, then upgrade to BIND 9.12.1-P2.
ISC would like to thank Tony Finch of the University of Cambridge for his assistance in discovering and analyzing this vulnerability.
Document Revision History:
1.0 Advance Notification, 09 May 2018
1.1 BIND 9.12.1-P1 was recalled before public announcement due to defect, the advisory language was re-written to be clearer about the exploit risk, and the public disclosure date was adjusted because of the problem with 9.12.1-P1, 17 May 2018
2.0 Public Disclosure, 18 May 2018
See our BIND 9 Security Vulnerability Matrix for a complete listing of security vulnerabilities and versions affected.
If you'd like more information on ISC Subscription Support and Advance Security Notifications, please visit https://www.isc.org/support/.
Do you still have questions? Questions regarding this advisory should go to firstname.lastname@example.org. To report a new issue, please encrypt your message using email@example.com's PGP key which can be found here: https://www.isc.org/downloads/software-support-policy/openpgp-key/. If you are unable to use encrypted email, you may also report new issues at: https://www.isc.org/community/report-bug/.
ISC patches only currently supported versions. When possible we indicate EOL versions affected. (For current information on which versions are actively supported, please see https://www.isc.org/downloads/).
ISC Security Vulnerability Disclosure Policy:
Details of our current security advisory policy and practice can be found in the ISC Software Defect and Security Vulnerability Disclosure Policy.
This Knowledgebase article is the complete and official security advisory document.
Internet Systems Consortium (ISC) is providing this notice on an "AS IS" basis. No warranty or guarantee of any kind is expressed in this notice and none should be implied. ISC expressly excludes and disclaims any warranties regarding this notice or materials referred to in this notice, including, without limitation, any implied warranty of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, absence of hidden defects, or of non-infringement. Your use or reliance on this notice or materials referred to in this notice is at your own risk. ISC may change this notice at any time. A stand-alone copy or paraphrase of the text of this document that omits the document URL is an uncontrolled copy. Uncontrolled copies may lack important information, be out of date, or contain factual errors.